The DNC and their anti-democratic ideology has been advocating and using lawfare for the past 50 years when they cannot pass legislation and force their will on the American people. We have so much in our nation that has been forced on our citizens, with bussing, school segregation, gay marriage, abortion, gender discrimination, racial quotas and a host of other issues through the courts. It now has a name it is known as lawfare… This is the deliberate action of filing lawsuits to push an agenda onto others by getting the federal and state courts to amend the Constitution to include whatever the latest policy or choice upon the nation. Many times these suits are filed in jurisdictions that have left leaning and liberal judges that hear these matters and wend their way through the courts until the matter is finally decided at the Supreme Court or the lower courts decision stands.

One famous case is how California came to have gay marriage be the law of the land for them. Citizens had ballot proposition 8 which amended the State Constitution to disallow gay marriage which passed. This was then challenged in the federal court and stuck down. The judge that heard the case at the district court level should have recused himself as he was gay himself, but the agenda mattered so the case worked its way through appellate courts and was denied a hearing at SCOTUS. So the will of the citizens in California was thwarted by a gay judge who found proposition 8 unconstitutional and the rest is history.

So even when the people have a ballot referendum their will can be made moot, by the decision(s) of a few judges in black robes. This is lawfare and we were treated to it with the gay marriage ruling in Obergefel v. Hodges clearly these decisions are contentious when a few judges take matters into their own hands and force ideology that is foreign to most citizens by using the courts onto us. Then when the Obergefel decision was rendered it created a completely new concept in constitutional law with the court creating the concept of ‘identity’ out of thin air which was rebuked by the dissenting opinions of the other four justices, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito.

Roe v. Wade which forced infanticide onto the nation in 1976 is still not settled, it may be legal but a huge swath of the nation still views this as infanticide, we can’t help but wonder if Obergefel v. Hodges will be as well and could end up being the Dred Scot decision of our day. We also saw that Obamacare was a particularly egregious example of lawfare as the legislation was rewritten by the Roberts Court to take a penalty and turn it into a tax. None of this is good law, as it uses the courts in a manner in which they are not supposed to entertain. They are simply to interpret law not rewrite or legislate from the bench.

What this means for our nation is the DNC and their abhorrent ideology need not have electoral success to control the legislative process they can through outside entities that liaison with them since the left and DNC has taken the long march through our institutions to subvert, law comity and use them to bend the discourse in our society. All that we are seeing out of this ideology is a nation destroying cancer that attacks one institution after another and forces their will on them and our citizens, when they hold the reins of power they push legislation like Obamacare which the majority of the citizens rejected and failed to garner even one GOP vote. Clearly the DNC is an ideology that will do all in its power to subvert our nation and Constitutional government and must be prosecuted for these activities. Back to DNC Lawfare in Federal Courts page.

RICOtheDNC.com 2017©

DNC Lawfare In Federal & State Courts Examined